top of page
  • Writer's pictureJohn Dempsey

Fake People Interviewing for Real Jobs - Recognizing Red Flags and Proven Tips to Outsmart Impersonators During Job Interviews

The unforgiving sun bore down on Mumbai's Lamington Road as Vihaan weaved through the bustling chaos, beads of sweat forming on his determined face. His quest led him to an electronics store, its sign a welcome sight in the crowded market. Following the twists and turns, he reached the back room, the nerve center of his aspirations. 

 

In the dimly lit space, Vihaan found the person he sought—a tech guru surrounded by the hum of electronic devices. This is a new trending industry in India, and for $150, this tech wizard would conduct Vihaan's IT cybersecurity screen interview. A website facilitated bookings, while a Google Drive folder stored a trove of past video interviews, creating a facade of legitimacy.

 

It was an intricate dance between the real and the fabricated, a dance Vihaan hoped would lead to financial security.  The allure of the "bait-and-switch" lay in its adaptability; phone or video interviews mattered little when the tech guru promised to seamlessly represent Vihaan in the virtual realm.

 

With the digital deception set, Vihaan and thousands of others have envisioned a future where they could bluff through tasks they had no business overcoming. Once in the role, the strategy shifts to adeptly faking competence, relying on tactics like blame-shifting and crafting creative excuses, such as taking time off for family crises, to shield against potential pitfalls that may expose their lack of technical skills.


 

 

Unveiling the Tactics of Impersonators in Virtual Interviews

 

In our world of virtual interviews, recognizing the strategies employed by impersonators is critical for safeguarding a company's integrity and assets. Advanced technologies have opened pathways for adept deceivers to infiltrate these virtual spaces. This vigilance isn't just about safeguarding a company's time and financial well-being; it acts as a barrier shielding sensitive information. Any breach of such data could severely damage the company's reputation and client relationships. Investing in a deep understanding of these tactics not only enables interviewers to maintain hiring integrity but also bolsters the organization's overall security stance.

 

Deepfake Technology Manipulation 

The advent of Deepfake technology has introduced a new level of sophistication to impersonation tactics in bait-and-switch interviews. Through the manipulation of facial identification, impostors can craft a remarkably realistic representation closely mirroring the appearance of a genuine candidate, thus significantly complicating the task of deception detection. Employing this technology, candidates can go as far as superimposing an entirely different face atop their own. Deepfake utilizes advanced deep learning artificial intelligence to seamlessly replace one person's likeness with another in various digital media, such as videos. Beyond the manipulation of facial features, candidates employ diverse methods to obscure the identity of their stand-ins, ranging from scratching or blurring webcams, applying filters, adjusting lighting, to even donning disguises.

Sidenote: Google has banned the training of AI systems that can be used to generate deepfakes on its Google Colaboratory platform per TechCrunch.

 

Real-Time Assistance 

One common tactic involves impersonators seeking assistance from an accomplice through a separate chat or a second phone line. This strategy allows them to receive real-time answers, creating the illusion of spontaneous and genuine responses during the interview. A choreographed performance wherein another person in the room provides answers, while the candidate being interviewed simply mouths the words, concealing the act of cheating.

 

Scripted Responses with Cheat Sheets 

Impersonators frequently rely on cheat sheets in phone interviews to deliver scripted responses convincingly. This method enables them to appear well-prepared and knowledgeable, despite lacking the genuine qualifications they claim. Deceptive candidates employ strategies such as discreetly receiving answers from an accomplice or consulting a hidden cheat sheet, skillfully evading the scrutiny of the interview camera.

 

Seamless Pre-recorded Responses 

Some impersonators take advantage of pre-recorded responses that seamlessly play during the interview. This method mimics authentic interaction, presenting an illusion of a live conversation while evading the scrutiny of traditional interview methods.


 

Safeguarding Hiring Integrity: The Advantage Utilizing Specialized Staffing Firms in Combatting Impersonation Risks

 

Recognizing and addressing the deceptive tactics employed by impersonators is now more crucial than ever. Recruiters and employers must maintain a vigilant stance, staying ahead with innovative solutions to safeguard the security and authenticity of candidate evaluations in the digital era.

 

Amy Teague, a seasoned expert and the founder of Rekruitd, sheds light on maintaining the integrity of the hiring process in the digital era.  "As recruiters and employers, we need to stay ahead of the game, constantly exploring new methods to safeguard the hiring process," Teague emphasizes, drawing attention to the ever-evolving nature of the industry. 


Specialized staffing companies like Rekruitd have become essential partners in navigating the complexities of digital hiring. With a dedicated focus on cybersecurity and IT staffing, Rekruitd employs cutting-edge interview tactics and technologies to proactively identify and mitigate risks associated with deceptive practices. 

 

Teague offers practical advice for employers, stating, "Consider incorporating several virtual on-camera interviews and requesting candidates to present a photo ID or another identifying document during remote sessions. These simple yet effective tactics significantly enhance the overall integrity of the recruitment process." 

 

 

Here are 10 Top Indicators that may suggest that something suspicious is occurring during the interview:

 

1. Inconsistent Body Language: Watch for discrepancies between verbal responses and non-verbal cues, such as avoiding eye contact, fidgeting, or nervous gestures.


2. Unusual Background Noises: Excessive or peculiar background sounds may indicate an attempt to mask or distract from something happening behind the scenes.


3. Virtual Platform Anomalies: Keep an eye out for unexpected virtual platform issues,     like dual cursors, strange icons, or unfamiliar applications running in the background.


4. Lighting Irregularities: Too much or too little lighting can be a sign of attempting to conceal information or someone else in the room.


5. Presence of Remote Desktop Icons: If the interviewee has remote desktop icons visible, it might suggest an attempt to manipulate the interview environment.


6. Extreme Nervousness: Excessive sweating, stammering, or visible signs of extreme nervousness can be indicators of discomfort or potential deception.


7. Delayed Responses: Lengthy pauses or delayed responses to questions may suggest that the candidate is consulting external sources for answers.


8. Unexplained Speaker Echoes: Speaker echoes may occur if two devices are picking up sound, potentially indicating the presence of undisclosed individuals.


9. Grainy Video Quality: Compromised computer bandwidth, especially in the case of remote desktop access, may result in poor video quality.


10. Unusual Eye and Cursor Movements: Inconsistent eye contact, cursor movements not matching tasks, or frequent distractions can be signs of distraction or dishonesty.

 

Remaining attentive to these indicators can help interviewers uncover potential deception and maintain the integrity of the hiring process.

 

If an imitation interview merely consumes your time, consider yourself fortunate; the consequences could be much more severe. Companies must exercise heightened vigilance when conducting interviews for positions that involve access to sensitive customer information, financial data, corporate IT databases, or proprietary information. Above all, it's crucial not to casually dismiss red flags that may emerge during background checks. Scammers frequently use stolen identities when applying for jobs, emphasizing the importance of erring on the side of caution. "Better safe than sorry" isn't just a cliché; it's a sound business practice that can safeguard both individuals and organizations.


 

 

 

 

Comments


bottom of page